Disks are shared without permission (?) [drive icons] [drive icon]

admin / May 30th, 2011/ Posted in Operating Systems / No Comments »

Q: Something strange that Ive never experienced in Windows 2000: all my drives are all marked as “shared” in the Sharing tab of drive properties. They are divided under the names C $, D $, etc. What is strange is the with the arm under it do not appear, besides the regular icons.

I unshared drive them, but after a reboot it again to be shared. Perhaps there is an application or service requires that the shares? I do not know all, and I doubt that it is something malicious.


Re:They are "Admin" shares, in that they are ACLed to the Local Administrators group only, and the ACL cannot be changed. The shares are recreated at every startup. (I think by the SERVER service, but I'm not sure)

Win2K and up have a registry key to disable the auto-creation IIRC.

Explain how one would access an administrative ($) share without permission, please.

That's a damn good question. I could've swore I've done it before, but now I can't reproduce it, go figure.


Re:$ just means it's 'hidden', meaning MS computers won't display them, other SMB clients can see them just fine and you don't need administrative permissions to access them.

Explain how one would access an administrative ($) share without permission, please.


Re:guy is right, those drive level shares are done by the OS.

They are "Admin" shares, in that they are ACLed to the Local Administrators group only, and the ACL cannot be changed. The shares are recreated at every startup. (I think by the SERVER service, but I'm not sure)


Re:Ok, my bad on the use of $, but this situation is such as I described, isn't it? I know they are the 'administrative shares' I know I don't have to do anything special to access them from my machine at work, but then again, my account also has admin priviledges on the domain, so I may be a little off there, but that would seem to be how they react.

Re:Originally posted by: STaSh

Didnt nimda or klez or one of those other stupid viruses open shares on the network?

I thought that nimda spread thru open shares…I dont think it will actually create open shares, just proliferate via shares that grant full access to Everyone.

I dont pay much attention to Windows viruses ;)


Re:Didnt nimda or klez or one of those other stupid viruses open shares on the network?

I thought that nimda spread thru open shares…I dont think it will actually create open shares, just proliferate via shares that grant full access to Everyone.


Re:$ just means it's 'hidden', meaning MS computers won't display them, other SMB clients can see them just fine and you don't need administrative permissions to access them.

Re:Nimda opens shares, but I think that you do see the arm icon in that case. Not sure, though, it's been a while since I've de-nimda'd a machine. Would be worth a scan if you haven't done one recently.

Re:Didnt nimda or klez or one of those other stupid viruses open shares on the network?

Re:When they are shared with the $ like you say, they are being shared as "administrative shares." That means that you have to give local admin credentials to be able to mount them from another machine. This will always happen with 2000 and XP, due to their network ready nature.

To give you a realworld use for that, at work I use the admin shares all the time to change permissions and add/remove files from peoples machines without having to walk over and disrupt their workflow. It's also much better than being shared normally, for this purpose, because they aren't browsable thru net-neighborhood.


Related posts


Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Name required

Mail (will not be published) required

Website