Pentium 4 HT or Pentium D? [socket 775] [model number]

admin / October 8th, 2010/ Posted in Hardware / No Comments »

Q: Was curious to getting some onpinions. Wondering should I use a 641 Cedar Mill Pentium 4 3.2 GHz or a 930 Pentium D 3.0 Ghz. They run on both stock and 300FSB . I will be overclocking. All opinions welcome as this is my first time to overclock. Also advice on overclocking in general will be welcome! Thank you.


Best Answer: Well, both of those processors lines are obsolete now…

However- between them, the Pentium-D is superior. That was Intel's early dual-core design, and encoding gets a dramatic boost from additional cores. The 3.4Ghz Pentium 4 is just an old single core CPU.

Still, even a bargain basement dual-core of recent vintage like the $60 E2200 is far better than either of those!
.


Re:pentium D. cedar mill has a 200mhz advantage but its single core. i'd much rather take an extra core and lose 200mhz which i can easily overclock to.

besides, i have a pentium d 930 and its just fine…overclocks to 4.1Ghz easy too.


Re:actually their stock fsb's are both 200mhz. basically, the 930 is 2 3ghz cedar mills on the same chip. so, chalk up another vote for the pentium d.

Re:Well we don't know if you use any multithreaded programs since you didn't mention ANYTHING about your usage. However the pentium-D 930 should be the lesser of 2 evils, since at least it's a dual core. There is really no reason to get a single core anymore, with dual cores being so cheap(or free in your case). LOL, but real friends don't let friends use pentium4's /D's.

Re:PD for the win!! ;) You can make pancakes for breakfast from the cpu fan I bet hhee. It's really a no brainer since HT isn't a true dual core.

Re:Originally posted by: guy
pd 930 obviously much better choice. 65 nm, you could oc to 3.8ghz easy. Also it's a true dual core unlike p4 ht.

Cedar Mill is 65nm as well. But I still agree the PD would be a better choice these days.


Re:Take the D. It's much better.

Re:Originally posted by: guy
pd 930 obviously much better choice. 65 nm, you could oc to 3.8ghz easy. Also it's a true dual core unlike p4 ht.

Lol…beat me to it.


Re:pd 930 obviously much better choice. 65 nm, you could oc to 3.8ghz easy. Also it's a true dual core unlike p4 ht.

Re:I won't be paying for either of the two processors. A friend of mine I did some work for told me I could have my pick between the two. Apprciate the the advice!

Re:First off…Welcome to AT!!

Second…
You would be better served to forget the P4 and the PD. Clock for clock, the Core 2 architecture is about 30-40% faster so….

My suggestion for a budget CPU would be this:
Intel Dual-Core E2160 Allendale 1.8GHz 1MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor – Retail (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116036&Tpk=E2160)


Related posts


Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Name required

Mail (will not be published) required

Website